Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 16(1): 182, 2021 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1282263

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The timing for heart surgery following cerebral embolization after cardiac valve vegetation is vital to postoperative recovery being uneventful, additionally Covid-19 may negatively affect the outcome. Minimally invasive methods and upgraded surgical instruments maximize the benefits of surgery also in complex cardiac revision cases with substantial perioperative risk. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68 y.o. patient, 10 years after previous sternotomy for OPCAB was referred to cardiac surgery on the 10th postoperative day after neurosurgical intervention for intracerebral bleeding with suspected mitral valve endocarditis. Mitral valve vegetation, tricuspid valve insufficiency and coronary stenosis were diagnosed and treated by minimally invasive revision cardiac surgery on the 14th postoperative day after neurosurgery. CONCLUSION: The present clinical case demonstrates for the first time that the minimally invasive approach via right anterior mini-thoracotomy can be safely used for concomitant complex mitral valve reconstruction, tricuspid valve repair and aorto-coronary bypass surgery, even as a revision procedure in the presence of florid endocarditis after recent neurosurgical intervention. The Covid-19 pandemic and prophylactic patient isolation slow down the efficacy of pulmonary weaning and mobilisation and prolong the need for ICU treatment, without adversely affecting long-term outcome.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Coronary Stenosis/surgery , Endocarditis/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Mitral Valve/surgery , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Video-Assisted Surgery/methods , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/instrumentation , Humans , Male , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Pandemics , Postoperative Complications , Reoperation , SARS-CoV-2 , Thoracotomy/adverse effects , Thoracotomy/instrumentation , Thoracotomy/methods , Video-Assisted Surgery/adverse effects
2.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 54(1): 11-23, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1235961

ABSTRACT

A new era of surgical visualization and magnification is poised to disrupt the field of otology and neurotology. The once revolutionary benefits of the binocular microscope now are shared with rigid endoscopes and exoscopes. These 2 modalities are complementary. The endoscope improves visualization of the hidden recesses through the external auditory canal or canal-up mastoidectomy. The exoscope provides an immersive visual experience and superior ergonomics compared with binocular microscopy. Endoscopes and exoscopes are poised to disrupt the standard of care for surgical visualization and magnification in otology and neurotology.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Endoscopes/standards , Endoscopy/instrumentation , Neurotology/instrumentation , Otolaryngology/instrumentation , Pandemics , Ear Canal/surgery , Endoscopy/standards , Equipment Design/standards , Humans , Mastoidectomy/instrumentation , Microsurgery/instrumentation , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Neurosurgical Procedures/instrumentation , Neurotology/standards , Otolaryngology/standards , Standard of Care/standards , United States
3.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther ; 52(5): 366-372, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-983603

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 infection has resulted in thousands of critically ill patients admitted to ICUs and treated with mechanical ventilation. Percutaneous tracheostomy is a well-known technique utilised as a strategy to wean critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation. Worldwide differences exist in terms of methods, operators, and settings, and questions remain regarding timing and indications. If tracheostomy is to be performed in COVID-19 patients, a safe environment is needed for optimal care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a guidewire dilating forceps tracheostomy procedure in COVID-19 patients that was optimised including apnoea-moments, protective clothing, checklists, and clear protocols. We performed a retrospective analysis of the outcome after tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients between March 2020 and May 2020. RESULTS: The follow-up of the first 16 patients, median age 62 years, revealed a median intubation time until tracheostomy of 18 days and median cannulation time of 20 days. The overall perioperative complication rate and complication rate while cannulated was 19%, mainly superficial bleeding. None of the healthcare providers involved in performing the procedure developed any symptoms of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: This COVID-19-centred strategy based on flexibility, preparation, and cooperation between healthcare providers with different backgrounds facilitated percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients without an increase in the overall complication rate or evidence of risk to healthcare providers. Our findings provide initial evidence that tracheostomy can be performed safely as a standard of care for COVID-19 patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation as was standard practice in ICU patients prior to the COVID-19 pandemic to promote ventilator weaning and patient recovery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Tracheostomy/methods , Aged , Anesthesia , Bronchoscopy , Checklist , Critical Care , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Personal Protective Equipment , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Instruments , Tracheostomy/instrumentation , Ventilator Weaning
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL